Suicide The Easy- Dreadful Outlet - 564 Words

I was reading a few posts on Facebook when I saw one that got my attention. It was about a girl that had committed suicide. She cut her wrists and left a note, where she explained why she did it, in a few words it said â€Å"I can’t take it anymore, everything is coming down, and it is the only way to stop the pain†. No one ever realized that she was sad, no one knew that she wasn’t feeling good not even her boyfriend or sisters, she was alone, in constant pain and no one ever knew about it. There are a lot of things that make people commit suicide, I’d like to explain what causes suicidal thoughts or suicide in the life of any teenager or adult, no one is exempted, anyone could be the suicide’s next victim. Suicide is commonly associated with depression; but, it is proven that it also tends to have stretch relations with many other psychiatric disorders and life and family events as well. First of all a very common cause is circumstances such as a stressed life, this includes serious financial or interpersonal relations problems. When a person doesn’t know how to solve this kind of situations, they tend to think that death is the easiest way out. It is the second most common cause of death in teenagers, just like this girl many other people do it to â€Å"solve† their problems. Another cause might be parents with a history of depression. A study done by Dr. David Brent, psychiatrist at the University Of Pittsburgh Medical Center stated that â€Å"a first-degree relative -- a parent,Show MoreRelatedThe War Had A Deep Impact On The American Veterans And Our Society2096 Words   |  9 Pages(Moffett). â€Å"Fiction, films, and television programs depicted Vietnam vets as drug-crazed psychotic killers, as vicious executioners in Vietnam and equally vicious menaces at home† (Oxford Companion). The 1978 movie The Deer Hunter, â€Å"explores the dreadful Vietnam experiences of three hunting buddies from a small town in Pennsylvania.† (Pendergast) Also, in 1978, the movie Coming Home, starring John Voight â€Å"as a handicapped Vietnam veteran† (Pendergast) who returns from the war angry and bitter. JaneRead MoreGambling a Bad Bet5057 Words   |  21 Pagescommunity only sees that there’s a million-dollar lottery and thinks: ‘Le t’s buy a few tickets and maybe I can win and pay back all my bills and take a nice vacation.’ That person does not think about the gambling addict, about the broken home, about the suicide that accompanies gambling addiction.†8 How truly rings the Bible’s warning that, â€Å"He that is greedy of gain troubleth his own house† (Proverbs 15:27). It’s time we realized that behind all of the glitter, greed, and glamour of big scale casino gamblingRead MoreFor Against by L.G. Alexander31987 Words   |  128 Pageswhich obtain in pre-literate communities. We become utterly dependent on the two most primitive media of communication: pictures and the spoken word. Television encourages passive enjoyment. We become content with second-hand experiences. It is so easy to sit in our armchairs watching others working. Little by little, television cuts us off from the real world. We get so lazy, we choose to spend a fine day in semi-darkness, glued to our sets, rather than go out into the world itself. Television mayRead MoreIgbo Dictionary129408 Words   |  518 Pagesnot confirm. At a later date, after his transfer to Umuahia, he added further words which are not necessarily correct in Onitsha; these are the red ink entries in the MS. At first glance, I thought the publication of this MS would be comparatively easy. The obvious course seemed to be to re-transcribe it from the Old orthography into the Official orthography, check and where necessary re-write the tones4 and eliminate any forms which were found to be not in current use in Onitsha. The major difficulty

Criminal Law Vs. Private Law - 905 Words

Criminal Law vs. Private Law The Rule of Law, as expressed through Canadian criminal law is important as our laws embody the basic moral values of society. The primary aims of criminal law are to protect the public and preserve peace (Barnhorst Barnhorst, 2013). Law also imposes limits on our actions and guides our choices in conduct. The conditions of the Rule of Law ensure that no individual, government or parliament is treated as above the law, and that everyone must obey the law or they must suffer the consequences. The primary reason that criminal law is necessary, rather than governing individual behaviour through private law, is because committing a criminal offence is seen as committing a crime against society as a whole rather than an individual. The protection and punishment of the offender should be proportionate to the offence committed and all Canadian courts should attempt to administer punishment to offenders using a Canada wide set of laws which are based on similar cases that occurred in the pa st, rather than private laws in order to avoid bias in different jurisdictions and areas of Canada. â€Å"Citizens of countries that do not adhere to recognize the rule of law are often unable to stand up against the government or other powerful interests without fear or attack and there are often reports of human rights violations† (The Law Society of British Columbia, 2013). A country that is not governed by the rule of law would result in laws and court proceedingsShow MoreRelatedPublic Law And Private Law1555 Words   |  7 Pagesdefinition of a law is â€Å"the whole system or set of rules made by the government of a town, state, country, etc.† In Canada, the law applies to everyone, including the government, police and anyone in a position of authority. Over the course of the unit, we have learned about many different topics in relation to Canadian Law; the 5 main topics I chose to represent in this collage are Public vs. Private Law, The Historical Sources of L aw, the ‘Triangle’, Rules vs. Laws, and Jurisdiction. Canadian Law can beRead MoreLaw As An Academic Discipline And Its Different Branches1367 Words   |  6 Pages1. Explain law as an academic discipline and its different branches Through state-sanctioned mechanisms and institutions, a system of rules and regulations are created, interpreted, and enforced. The legal discipline studies this system and uses it as a primary social mediator between people. The field of law encompasses a broad range of academic disciplines including but not limited to criminal law, education law, employment and labor law, international law, civil rights, etc. 2. Explain theRead MoreRoles and Responsibilities of Public Policing vs. Private Security1652 Words   |  7 PagesRoles and Responsibilities of Public Policing vs. Private Security ASJ-502 February 6, 2012 Abstract This paper explores the similarities and differences of public police and private security throughout history. How the criminal justice system and public police and private security are linked to each other. The essential policies that have been developed and how these police have assisted in the cooperation between police and private security. Finally, the need for a comprehensive securityRead MoreThe Difference Between Private and Public Law Systems in the O.J. Simpson Trial735 Words   |  3 Pagessomeone be acquitted in criminal court and later found liable for the tort of wrongful death? What are the key differences between private and public law systems? Let us start by answering the question about the differences between public and private law. There are several critical distinctions between  public law and  private law. The main one is that public law protects society as a whole and private law governs interactions between individuals or groups. Furthermore, public law is typically determinedRead MoreReflection On The And Procedural Law815 Words   |  4 PagesVega, Racquel Butler LAW/421 September 29, 2015 Michele Riley Weekly Reflection Team â€Å"A† very much enjoyed its learning experience in Week One of Law/421, and delved further into understanding the differences between substantive law, procedural law, criminal law, civil law, common law, and statutory law. In addition, Team â€Å"A† researched U.S. Constitution amendments that were implemented to protect the rights of businesses and organizations. Substantive Law vs. Procedural Law According to MelvinRead MorePrivate And Public Criminal Investigation1308 Words   |  6 PagesPrivate and Public Criminal Investigation Comparison Paper Police officers are public officials that have a legal and ethical duty to members of the public including the suspect in a criminal investigation. Private security investigators are hired by a business or organization and are not held to the high legal and ethical standard faced by the police but they also do not have the same power of discretion. Law enforcement is responsible for investigating crimes that occur within their jurisdictionRead MoreClassification Of Law And Law912 Words   |  4 PagesClassifications of Law Everything that a person does is governed by a set of rules that are followed. There are rules for sports, the workplace, and games. There are also rules imposed by morality and custom that play an important role in telling people what is right and what is wrong. However, some rules impose are called laws. In this paper analysis, the classifications of laws will be discussed and how it relates to the biblical concept of justice. The classifications of laws include: public versusRead MoreIntent of the Framers1628 Words   |  7 PagesIntent of the Framers In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express considerationRead MoreRelationship Between Public and Private Police1028 Words   |  5 PagesRelationship between Private and Public Police The relationship between public and private police has always been a one that is on the outskirts of each other. There is a thin line between what a private officer can and cannot do when it comes to enforcing the laws and rules on a property, there comes a point where they need the assistance of public officers who have the training and legal authority to handle a certain individual or situation. Although many of the individuals in the private sector haveRead MoreExclusionary Rule vs. Private Security: A Case Study673 Words   |  3 PagesExclusionary Rule vs. Private Security The exclusionary rule is a rule that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials (Exclusionary Rule). Security officers, in general, usually have the same authority as a citizen. The exclusionary rule generally does not apply to private security unless it is abusive or becomes an invasion of privacy (Chapter 7: Security and the Law). Facilities that hire private security personnel should always have clear policies on what is and

Tragedy in Waco Texas Free Essays

string(70) " makes the groups more of a sect with some cult-like characteristics\." Many people in this world tend to belong to a religious group. People feel that religion is a way to fill an emptiness they may be feeling inside. It is a way to comfort those who may have lost loved ones knowing that they are now in a â€Å"better place† and we too will join them there once it is our time. We will write a custom essay sample on Tragedy in Waco Texas or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, some people belong to either a religious sect or cult. These groups are not considered meet the standards of what it means to be a religion or they simply do not have enough people following them. In the early 90s, many people had a narrow-minded vision of what exactly the Branch Davidians were in Waco Texas.Stuart A. Wright presented an unbiased opinion in his book Armageddon in Waco so everyone could question what really happened and whether or not the government was justified in their actions. There are several differences between a religion, a sect, and a cult. According to our notes worldly religions meet a certain criteria to be known mainstream. Each religion has a long history of existence and ancient texts. The religion has many people who follow it and elites that adhere and accept it (i. e. Emperor Constantine).The religion is normalized an influential; no one questions the faith. Finally, there is a cultural/social integration of the religion; for example, when someone new is being initiated into the presidency they must swear on the Bible. Some major religions are Christianity containing 2. 1 billion followers, Islam containing 1. 5 billion followers, and Judaism containing 14 million followers (class slide show dated 11/18). A religious sect has similar qualities of a religion, but they feel they have made improvements to older established religious.According to our notes, sects are a branch of previously existing religions; the group uses old ancient texts (like the Bible or the Qur’an) and mix new interpretations of that text. An example of this would be the book of Mormon. These sects are not fully accepted in mainstream society and are considered to be â€Å"weird† by major religions. The sect usually contained a small number of followers who have a disdain for mainstream religions. Elites are not usually members of religious sects, but rather choose to attack them claiming they are blasphemers. Finally, many sects started to reform a much larger church.Some examples of religious sects would be the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Scientologists (class slide show dated 11/18). Although, I would argue that Scientology has more cult like qualities than sect like qualities; it is only labeled a sect because its members are people like Tom Cruise and John Travolta. A group that is considered a cult usually does not have many members all of which are not dependent on orthodox religious beliefs. According to our notes, cults usually have many different ideas, a lot of which are about the end of the world.These groups are often hostile, but at the same time provide members with everything the group needs. Outsiders often view these groups as threats; this is why they are labeled a cult. Cults have deviant beliefs about sex, drug use, and other acceptable behavior (class slide show dated 11/18). Myths are also associated with cults and the media plays on these myths to present these cults as a threat to society. According to our notes from the slideshow, some cult myths are that members are brainwashed, they are sexual deviants, there is abuse among members, and there are strange acts like sacrificing animals etc.An example of a cult would be Jim Jones and the People’s Temple mass suicide. Jim Jones managed to create one of the largest mass suicides in history convincing 900 people to kill themselves by drinking poisonous Kool-Aid. In my opinion, the Branch Davidians in Waco Texas could be classified as a sect with cult-like characteristics. According to the documentary, â€Å"The Final Report: Waco Tragedy,† the Branch Davidian group is a branch of the Seven Day Adventist Church. Their leader, David Koresh, taught his follows of many end time prophecies.Koresh was following the teachings of the founding Davidian named Victor Tasho Houteff. According to Stuart A. Wright, who edited the book Armageddon in Waco, â€Å"Houteff interpreted the Bible in terms of prophecy fulfillment†¦he reconstructed a history on the basis of mysterious and arcane passages recorded in Daniel, and interpreted signs in current events which suggested fulfillment of end times† (pg. 23). Many myths circling cults are about end times and the end of the world itself. Since that is the basis of the Branch Davidian group it is obvious why they were view as â€Å"different† or â€Å"crazy† when thinking the world will end.During the early 1990’s, the Davidians were a very closed off group living in their compound called Mt. Carmel; this played right into cult like myths presented by the media. It brought about questions like â€Å"What are they doing it there? † or â€Å"Why is everything secretive? It must be illegal. † It didn’t help that the Davidians had their own money system and educational system in order to design the culture for future generations (Wright pg. 27). According to the documentary â€Å"Waco: Rules of Engagement,† David Koresh had several children with various different â€Å"wives. All of said â€Å"wives† were in actuality the legal wives of his followers. This played right into another cult myth; the myth that the Branch Davidians had deviant beliefs toward sex. Although the Davidians have many cult-like myths circling them, the fact remains they are just myths not proof. The group did not meet any other of the criteria for being considered a cult. It was obvious that the government wanted to pose this little branch of the Seven Day Adventist Church as a threat because they did not meet social norms. Cults are said to be their own group entirely with new thoughts, beliefs, and ideas. The Branch Davidians share the beliefs of the Seven Day Adventists since that is the religion they stem from. This makes the groups more of a sect with some cult-like characteristics. You read "Tragedy in Waco Texas" in category "Papers" David Koresh was also look upon as a threat because he was housing illegal firearms. According to the documentary â€Å"Waco: The Rules of Engagement,† Koresh was presented to the people as an insane cult leader who was in possession of illegal weapons.The media, BTAF, and FBI construed people into believing Koresh would use these weapons on people thus making Koresh a threat to the public. The ATF warrants against Koresh accused him of holding these illegal weapons as well as sexually abusing children (which still cannot be proven). To make the Waco group more of a threat to the public the media, former Davidians, and the government all make certain claims about the group and play into people’s fears. â€Å"Claims-making is more effective if the particular issues target problems that reflect pre-existing or widespread social fears and apprehensions† (Wright 79).Claims making allows a small window for what they consider to be outside of the social norm; in other words you can be â€Å"weird,† but not â€Å"too weird. † The media presented David Koresh with the nickname â€Å"The Sinful Messiah. † The name itself sends out an alert in people’s minds; anyone who hears this derogatory name is now well aware this man must be a â€Å"weirdo. † On March 3, 1993, Mark England and Darlene McCormick released an article in the Waco Tribune-Herald Series called â€Å"The Sinful Messiah,† calling David Koresh by his birth name (Vernon Howell) and spreading rumors about various things he was accused of in the Mt.Carmel compound. England and McCormick claim they have interviewed several former Davidian members who said Koresh was guilty of abusing children physically and psychologically, having sex with underage girls, and had at least 15 â€Å"wives. † England and McCormick also make claims that Koresh (or Howell as they refer to him) fathered many children from his various â€Å"wives† while living in the compound. It says in the article, â€Å"County records show no birth certificates for many children whom former cult members said have been born to Branch Davidian women since the late 1980’s.A former cult member once registered as a midwife in McLennan County said she delivered twin girls in 1991 to a young Branch Davidian woman living at Mount Carmel. The midwife said Howell ordered her not to register the babies with local officials, a violation of state law. † The problem with these accusations however, is that they are all from â€Å"anonymous† sources. It is almost like reading a tabloid magazine. If a tabloid is trying to make it seem like two people in Hollywood are dating they will write in the article quotes from these â€Å"anonymous† sources that are proven false majority of the time.When I read this article I had the same feeling as if I were reading a bogus article in Star Magazine. I also feel the way England and McCormick refused to call him David Koresh seemed derogatory. The fact that the writers purposely called him Vernon Howell gave the article an air of sarcasm. It was as if they were saying, â€Å"Look at this crazy guy who thinks he’s the messiah; his name is Vernon Howell. † However, the article fails to mention Vernon Howell did in fact change his name legally to David Koresh. I do not think by any means that David Koresh was the messiah, but I think it was wrong to mock the fact that he changed his name. The media wanted to present him as some crazy man from Texas; the writers were clearly mocking him and wanted to let the public know it was allowed and encouraged to look at David Koresh as if he were insane. The only real source in the article seemed to be from a girl by the name of Kiri Jewell. Kiri’s father and mother were divorced and had joint custody of her. However, her father rarely saw her when Kiri and her mother went to live in the compound. However, the child abuse thing was blown completely out of proportion.After the massacre occurred and the hearings were going on in congress in 1995, Kiri Jewell testified against David Koresh claiming he sexually abused her. According to footage shown in the documentary â€Å"Waco: Rules of Engagement,† Kiri went on record saying that when she was just 10 years old she was sexually assaulted by Koresh. However, Kiri Jewell is not a reliable source as well. In the documentary, after Kiri makes her statement, the Davidians defense attorneys show that Jewell has made several contradictory statements in the past. The documentary then flashes to an interview with the Sherriff of Waco.He explains that they are yet to charge Koresh of any form of abuse, but if there was anything like that going on with girls that were at least fourteen and had parental consent then it is not illegal. It may be morally wrong to outsiders looking in, but to them it was perfectly natural and acceptable (not saying I agree with that, but I’m not a Branch Davidian). However, I do think the media took one girl’s accusations and made a mountain out of a molehill. They knew people would respond poorly after hearing any form of abuse toward children, thus justifying the military actions towards the Waco group. In class we watched two documentaries; one was titled â€Å"The Final Report: Tragedy at Waco† the other titled â€Å"Waco: Rules of Engagement. † Both documentaries gave viewers extremely different feelings toward them same event in Waco, Texas. When watching â€Å"The Final Report: Tragedy at Waco,† the producers of the documentary purposely make the Branch Davidian group seem alien and obviously cannot be trusted since they were so closed off from everyone else. The documentary starts off by asking a series of questions like â€Å"Who are the Branch Davidians? and â€Å"Who is David Koresh? † There is music playing in the background almost comparable to that someone would hear in a horror movie. It is clear from the start the purpose of this documentary is to make the Branch Davidians seem like a menacing crazy cult from the Boondocks of Texas. This documentary also only seemed to present one side of the story. The made it seem like it was the most obv ious thing in the world that the Davidians wanted to kill themselves in a mass suicide and therefore, when under attack by the FBI, started a fire. This documentary was shorter and did not present a fair amount of details from both sides of the story. This documentary even has the world â€Å"tragedy† in the title; right away people will play into the idea that the fire was just another mass suicide by some insane religious â€Å"cult† in the middle of no where Texas. It played right into what the media stereotyped the group to look like. The second documentary we watched was titled â€Å"Waco: Rules of Engagement. † In my opinion this documentary was much more fair and presented both sides as best as it could.This documentary was done with a more unbiased eye, unlike the first one. However, this documentary did do a successful job of making the FBI look like screw-ups and this whole thing was just a big government cover-up. Maybe it just showed the incident at Mount Carmel for exactly what it was. Technically in the documentary the FBI did a good job of making themselves look like screw-ups because the documentary simply showed footage of thing various agents said. On some level this documentary did manipulate viewers; for example when they showed the dead bodies that were burned it gave the Davidians a sympathy vote.However, this documentary did not alter anything, but rather presented it as it was. I felt it allowed the people to get a clearer look at what happen and maybe see the media altered people’s perception of what really happened. It is difficult to say who started the fire. In my opinion this whole raid was a complete screw up. In the book Armageddon in Waco it says, â€Å"The BATF raid was a monumental failure. Subsequently, the April 19, 1993, FBI CS gas assault on the compound and the ensuing fire (whatever its cause) fulfilled only one stated objective—that of suppressing an armed group.The children who were to be saved from abuse died instead† (Wright pg. 229). There is no accurate cause of what started the fire. However, according to the documentary â€Å"Waco: Rules of Engagement† I have reason to believe it was started by accident from the FBI tanks. After the FBI released the gas that was supposed to be harmless and â€Å"nonflammable† into the compound it was shown by the person who invented infrared cameras and readings that several shots were fired from FBI tanks even though they went on record saying no shots were fired that day. During the trials they tried to present it like those flashes were light being reflected, however, these cameras only pick up heat so it would be virtually impossible to pick up a reflection; needless to say Congress and everyone in the courtroom were obviously stunned. In my own personal opinion I feel the shots from the FBI tanks mixed with the gas released into the compound were the cause of the fire. After seeing interviews with various Branch Davidian members who died on that day it was obvious they had no intention of this mass suicide.It doesn’t even coincide with their beliefs; they believed that there would be a final battle, which they would come out victorious. Although on some levels this was a battle I do not believe they would have given up and killed themselves. If there who belief system was based on this battle wouldn’t they fight back? When the fire started it looked like several explosions were going off. That could only have occurred when the shots m ixed with the gas that was spread throughout the building. The FBI did not want to admit they messed up big time so they formed an alliance with the media presenting a completely different story.If someone were to see a headline about the Branch Davidians they would see words like â€Å"cult† and â€Å"mass suicide. † The media presented the story as if the group started the fire themselves. Media groups claimed to have phone conversations indicating they had planned these actions; however, the phone conversations so no indication that the Branch Davidians had any intention of starting a fire to kill all its members. Most people even tried to escape the compound when it was in flames. If a mass suicide were really the planned course of action why would people be trying to escape?Although the media presents that the fire was entirely the Branch Davidians’ fault, other evidence can prove otherwise. We discussed in class that this incident at Waco was indirectly to the Oklahoma City bombing. Timothy McVeigh felt it would send a clear message to attack the groups involved in the trials of the Branch Davidians because of their greatest mistake and cover-up. McVeigh was so angered by this government cover up that he felt he should bomb the federal buildings where people like FBI and ATF agents worked.He realized after it was wrong to kill innocent people and said he should have only gone after those involved in the incident at Waco. Although very different, religions, sects, cults have lots in common. They each have a group of lost souls who are looking beyond this life in hopes of a better afterlife. The Davidian’s beliefs may have been questionable, but it is what they believed. This is America where in our first amendment we have freedom of religion. The Davidians were nice people and did not deserve they fate they were delt. How to cite Tragedy in Waco Texas, Papers